Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Which is better?

At the moment, I've got my reviews arranged by date. But I'm not sure if that's the way I want to go. If I'm going to change it, I'd better do so before the list gets too long.

So which way do you think works best: listing them alphabetically by author, alphabetically by title, or chronologically by review date?


  1. My vote: alphabetically by title. =)

  2. it might look better to have them alphabetically listed, but having them chronologically done might be more convenient for those who come here often. :) did that help? haha probably not. i tried.

  3. Its funny you mention this. I have been thinking I need to figure out a way to get links on my page to separate things out a little better. (Which I am not quite sure how to do at this moment, so I will have to take a long look to figure it out.) But I always run into this thought. I am never sure how to sort everything.

    I always got to alpha. by author because then all the books by that person will be together and you can see all of them. But then I worry that maybe only the title is remembered and that order wont help. I don't know which is best. I usually go back to author order though.

    Sorry, I may not have been much help. I ponder the same question all the time, with my book order over at Library thing.

  4. I think by title. 'Cause I always remember titles and forget authors.

  5. I think alphabetically by title or author would be great... so hard to decide!